GROK’S CHOSEN SEARCHLINKS
1. [https://www.catribunal.org.uk/cases](https://www.catribunal.org.uk/cases)
**Overview**: The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal’s case database lists ongoing and past competition cases, with a search bar for keywords and filters for case number, date, and status.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “ad tech”`
– **Filters**: Status = “Active”, Date = 2020-2025
– **Goal**: Find cases like Ad Tech Collective Action LLP (1572/7/7/22) on self-preferencing.
– **Relevance**: Supports gross price and take rate effects. [](https://www.catribunal.org.uk/)
– **Search**: `”digital advertising” AND “publishers”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Collective Proceedings”, Date = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Identify publisher-led claims against Google.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of umbrella effects and overhang damages.
– **Search**: `”self-preferencing” AND “competition”`
– **Filters**: Status = “Pending”, Date = 2023-2025
– **Goal**: Locate recent cases on ad tech market distortions.
– **Relevance**: Ties to reduced competition and innovation.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “mobile search”`
– **Filters**: Case Number = “1606/7/7/23”, Status = “Active”
– **Goal**: Access Nikki Stopford v. Google for consumer harm details.
– **Relevance**: Supports default search agreements and barriers to entry. [](https://www.catribunal.org.uk/)
– **Search**: `”Android” AND “tying”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Collective Proceedings”, Date = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find cases on Android MADAs.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of consumer harm and reduced choice.
– **Search**: `”consumer choice” AND “search engine”`
– **Filters**: Status = “Pending”, Date = 2022-2025
– **Goal**: Identify consumer-focused competition cases.
– **Relevance**: Ties to innovation reduction and market control.
—
### 2. [https://ec.europa.eu/competition-policy/antitrust/cases](https://ec.europa.eu/competition-policy/antitrust/cases)
**Overview**: The European Commission’s competition case search tool allows queries by policy area, case number, title, and date. Rules emphasize using multiple criteria for precision (e.g., NACE codes, case status).
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “ad tech”`
– **Filters**: Policy Area = “Antitrust”, NACE = “J63.1”, Status = “Open”
– **Goal**: Find ongoing investigations like AT.40670 on ad tech practices.
– **Relevance**: Supports self-preferencing and gross price effects. [](https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_3143)
– **Search**: `”digital advertising” AND “publishers”`
– **Filters**: NACE = “J58″, Date = 2019-2025
– **Goal**: Identify cases involving publisher harms.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of take rate and umbrella effects.
– **Search**: `”self-preferencing” AND “competition”`
– **Filters**: Policy Area = “Antitrust”, Status = “Closed”
– **Goal**: Retrieve rulings like Google Shopping (AT.39740) for precedent.
– **Relevance**: Ties to innovation harm and market control. [](https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/es/memo_17_1785)
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “Android”`
– **Filters**: Policy Area = “Antitrust”, Case Number = “AT.40099″
– **Goal**: Access Android case details on tying practices.
– **Relevance**: Supports default search agreements and barriers to entry. [](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antitrust_cases_against_Google_by_the_European_Union)
– **Search**: `”mobile search” AND “consumer”`
– **Filters**: NACE = “J61″, Date = 2015-2025
– **Goal**: Find consumer-focused mobile search cases.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of reduced choice and innovation.
– **Search**: `”default search” AND “Google”`
– **Filters**: Policy Area = “Antitrust”, Status = “Closed”
– **Goal**: Locate cases on exclusivity agreements (e.g., Apple-Google).
– **Relevance**: Ties to consumer harm and market dominance.
—
### 3. [https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-v-google-llc](https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-v-google-llc)
**Overview**: The US DOJ’s page for the Google antitrust case provides court documents and updates, with no explicit search function but browsable filings.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: Browse for `”ad tech”` in case filings
– **Filters**: Document Type = “Complaint”, Date = 2023-2025
– **Goal**: Find DOJ claims on Google’s ad tech self-preferencing.
– **Relevance**: Supports gross price and take rate effects. [](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/10/technology/european-union-apple-google-antitrust.html)
– **Search**: Browse for `”publishers” AND “advertising”`
– **Filters**: Document Type = “Expert Report”
– **Goal**: Identify analyses of publisher revenue losses.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of umbrella effects and overhang damages.
– **Search**: Browse for `”self-preferencing” AND “ad tech”`
– **Filters**: Document Type = “Court Ruling”
– **Goal**: Locate rulings on Google’s ad tech dominance.
– **Relevance**: Ties to reduced competition and innovation.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: Browse for `”mobile search” AND “Google”`
– **Filters**: Document Type = “Complaint”, Date = 2020-2025
– **Goal**: Find DOJ claims on mobile search tying.
– **Relevance**: Supports default search agreements and barriers to entry.
– **Search**: Browse for `”consumer harm” AND “search”`
– **Filters**: Document Type = “Memorandum”
– **Goal**: Identify evidence of consumer impacts.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of reduced choice and innovation.
– **Search**: Browse for `”Apple” AND “default search”`
– **Filters**: Document Type = “Court Filing”
– **Goal**: Locate documents on Apple-Google exclusivity deals.
– **Relevance**: Ties to consumer harm and market control.
—
### 4. [https://www.statista.com/topics/1176/online-advertising](https://www.statista.com/topics/1176/online-advertising)
**Overview**: Statista’s online advertising page provides market data and reports, with a search bar for keywords and filters for region and category.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”digital advertising UK” “market share”`
– **Filters**: Region = “United Kingdom”, Category = “Market Insights”
– **Goal**: Quantify Google’s ad tech market dominance.
– **Relevance**: Supports self-preferencing and gross price effects.
– **Search**: `”publisher revenue” “digital ads”`
– **Filters**: Region = “Europe”, Date = 2020-2025
– **Goal**: Find data on publisher ad revenue declines.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of take rate and umbrella effects.
– **Search**: `”ad tech competition” “UK”`
– **Filters**: Category = “Industry Reports”
– **Goal**: Identify reports on ad tech market concentration.
– **Relevance**: Ties to reduced competition and innovation.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”mobile search UK” “market share”`
– **Filters**: Region = “United Kingdom”, Category = “Digital Devices”
– **Goal**: Quantify Google’s mobile search dominance.
– **Relevance**: Supports default search agreements and market control.
– **Search**: `”consumer behavior” “mobile search”`
– **Filters**: Region = “Europe”, Date = 2020-2025
– **Goal**: Find data on consumer reliance on default search.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of reduced choice and innovation.
– **Search**: `”search engine competition” “UK”`
– **Filters**: Category = “Market Insights”
– **Goal**: Explore competition dynamics in mobile search.
– **Relevance**: Ties to barriers to entry and consumer harm.
—
### 5. [https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/multi-sector-research/cmr](https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/multi-sector-research/cmr)
**Overview**: Ofcom’s Communications Market Reports provide UK telecom and media data, browsable by year and topic, with no explicit search function.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: Browse for `”digital advertising”` in latest CMR
– **Filters**: Year = 2023-2025, Section = “Media”
– **Goal**: Find data on ad tech market trends.
– **Relevance**: Supports self-preferencing and gross price effects.
– **Search**: Browse for `”publisher revenue” “online advertising”`
– **Filters**: Year = 2020-2025, Section = “Online”
– **Goal**: Identify publisher revenue impacts.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of take rate and umbrella effects.
– **Search**: Browse for `”ad tech market” “UK”`
– **Filters**: Year = Latest, Section = “Advertising”
– **Goal**: Locate market concentration data.
– **Relevance**: Ties to reduced competition and innovation.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: Browse for `”mobile search” “UK”`
– **Filters**: Year = 2023-2025, Section = “Mobile”
– **Goal**: Find usage data on mobile search engines.
– **Relevance**: Supports default search agreements and market control.
– **Search**: Browse for `”consumer behavior” “search engines”`
– **Filters**: Year = 2020-2025, Section = “Online”
– **Goal**: Identify consumer reliance on Google search.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of reduced choice and innovation.
– **Search**: Browse for `”search engine competition” “mobile”`
– **Filters**: Year = Latest, Section = “Digital Services”
– **Goal**: Explore competition in mobile search markets.
– **Relevance**: Ties to barriers to entry and consumer harm.
—
### 6. [https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/online-platforms-and-digital-advertising-market-study](https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/online-platforms-and-digital-advertising-market-study)
**Overview**: The CMA’s page for the Online Platforms and Digital Advertising Market Study includes reports and appendices, with a site search for keywords.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”digital advertising” “Google” “market study”`
– **Filters**: Document Type = “Final Report”, Date = 2019-2025
– **Goal**: Access CMA findings on Google’s ad tech dominance.
– **Relevance**: Supports self-preferencing and gross price effects. [](https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/case_details.cfm?proc_code=1_39740)
– **Search**: `”publisher revenue” “ad tech”`
– **Filters**: Document Type = “Appendices”
– **Goal**: Find data on publisher ad revenue losses.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of take rate and umbrella effects.
– **Search**: `”self-preferencing” “ad tech”`
– **Filters**: Document Type = “Case Updates”, Date = 2020-2025
– **Goal**: Identify updates on ad tech competition issues.
– **Relevance**: Ties to reduced competition and innovation.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”mobile search” “Google” “market study”`
– **Filters**: Document Type = “Final Report”, Date = 2019-2025
– **Goal**: Find CMA findings on mobile search dominance.
– **Relevance**: Supports default search agreements and market control.
– **Search**: `”consumer choice” “search engines”`
– **Filters**: Document Type = “Appendices”
– **Goal**: Identify consumer behavior data in mobile search.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of reduced choice and innovation.
– **Search**: `”Android” “tying” “CMA”`
– **Filters**: Document Type = “Case Updates”, Date = 2020-2025
– **Goal**: Locate investigations into Android tying practices.
– **Relevance**: Ties to barriers to entry and consumer harm.
—
### 7. [https://www.ssrn.com/index.cfm/en/](https://www.ssrn.com/index.cfm/en/)
**Overview**: SSRN hosts academic papers with advanced search by keyword, author, and discipline.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “ad tech” AND “self-preferencing”`
– **Filters**: Discipline = “Economics”, Date = 2020-2025
– **Goal**: Find papers on Google’s ad tech practices.
– **Relevance**: Supports gross price and take rate effects.
– **Search**: `”digital advertising” AND “publishers” AND “competition”`
– **Filters**: Discipline = “Law”, Date = 2019-2025
– **Goal**: Identify studies on publisher harms.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of umbrella effects and overhang damages.
– **Search**: `”ad tech market” AND “innovation”`
– **Filters**: Discipline = “Business”, Date = 2021-2025
– **Goal**: Explore analyses of ad tech market dynamics.
– **Relevance**: Ties to reduced competition and innovation.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “mobile search” AND “tying”`
– **Filters**: Discipline = “Economics”, Date = 2020-2025
– **Goal**: Find papers on mobile search tying practices.
– **Relevance**: Supports default search agreements and barriers to entry.
– **Search**: `”consumer choice” AND “search engines”`
– **Filters**: Discipline = “Law”, Date = 2019-2025
– **Goal**: Identify studies on consumer impacts in search markets.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of reduced choice and innovation.
– **Search**: `”Android” AND “market dominance”`
– **Filters**: Discipline = “Business”, Date = 2021-2025
– **Goal**: Explore analyses of Android’s market control.
– **Relevance**: Ties to consumer harm and market barriers.
—
### 8. [https://oxfordbusinessgroup.com/reports/united-kingdom](https://oxfordbusinessgroup.com/reports/united-kingdom)
**Overview**: Oxford Business Group provides UK economic reports, with a site search for keywords and browsable sections by sector.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”digital advertising UK”`
– **Filters**: Sector = “Technology”, Report Type = “Economic Updates”
– **Goal**: Find reports on ad tech market trends.
– **Relevance**: Supports self-preferencing and gross price effects.
– **Search**: `”publisher revenue” “digital”`
– **Filters**: Sector = “Media”, Date = 2020-2025
– **Goal**: Identify publisher revenue declines.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of take rate and umbrella effects.
– **Search**: `”ad tech competition” “UK”`
– **Filters**: Sector = “Digital Economy”
– **Goal**: Explore market concentration analyses.
– **Relevance**: Ties to reduced competition and innovation.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”mobile search UK”`
– **Filters**: Sector = “Technology”, Report Type = “Market Reports”
– **Goal**: Find data on mobile search market dominance.
– **Relevance**: Supports default search agreements and market control.
– **Search**: `”consumer digital behavior” “UK”`
– **Filters**: Sector = “Digital Economy”, Date = 2020-2025
– **Goal**: Identify consumer reliance on mobile search.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of reduced choice and innovation.
– **Search**: `”search engine competition” “mobile”`
– **Filters**: Sector = “Technology”
– **Goal**: Explore competition dynamics in mobile search.
– **Relevance**: Ties to barriers to entry and consumer harm.
—
### 9. [https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=your-guid-to-lexology](https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=your-guid-to-lexology)
**Overview**: Lexology offers legal articles with advanced search by jurisdiction, practice area, and keyword.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “ad tech” AND “abuse of dominance”`
– **Filters**: Jurisdiction = “United Kingdom”, Practice Area = “Competition”
– **Goal**: Find legal commentary on Google’s ad tech practices.
– **Relevance**: Supports self-preferencing and gross price effects.
– **Search**: `”digital advertising” AND “publishers” AND “UK”`
– **Filters**: Practice Area = “Antitrust”, Date = 2020-2025
– **Goal**: Identify articles on publisher harms.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of take rate and umbrella effects.
– **Search**: `”self-preferencing” AND “ad tech” AND “competition”`
– **Filters**: Jurisdiction = “European Union”, Practice Area = “Competition”
– **Goal**: Explore EU precedents applicable to UK law.
– **Relevance**: Ties to reduced competition and innovation.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “mobile search” AND “tying”`
– **Filters**: Jurisdiction = “United Kingdom”, Practice Area = “Competition”
– **Goal**: Find commentary on mobile search tying practices.
– **Relevance**: Supports default search agreements and barriers to entry.
– **Search**: `”consumer choice” AND “search engines” AND “UK”`
– **Filters**: Practice Area = “Consumer Protection”, Date = 2020-2025
– **Goal**: Identify articles on consumer impacts.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of reduced choice and innovation.
– **Search**: `”Android” AND “default search” AND “antitrust”`
– **Filters**: Jurisdiction = “European Union”, Practice Area = “Antitrust”
– **Goal**: Explore EU legal insights on Android tying.
– **Relevance**: Ties to consumer harm and market barriers.
—
### 10. [https://litigationfinancejournal.com/](https://litigationfinancejournal.com/)
**Overview**: Litigation Finance Journal covers funding for legal cases, with a search bar for keywords and topics.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”competition law” “digital advertising” “funding”`
– **Filters**: Topic = “Litigation Funding”, Date = 2020-2025
– **Goal**: Find funding trends for ad tech competition cases.
– **Relevance**: Supports case viability and publisher harm claims.
– **Search**: `”Google” “ad tech” “litigation finance”`
– **Filters**: Topic = “Antitrust”, Date = 2022-2025
– **Goal**: Identify funders backing Google-related ad tech cases.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of market impact and gross price effects.
– **Search**: `”publisher claims” “funding” “UK”`
– **Filters**: Topic = “Collective Actions”
– **Goal**: Explore funding for publisher-led actions.
– **Relevance**: Ties to umbrella effects and overhang damages.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”competition law” “mobile search” “funding”`
– **Filters**: Topic = “Litigation Funding”, Date = 2020-2025
– **Goal**: Find funding for mobile search competition cases.
– **Relevance**: Supports consumer harm and default search agreements.
– **Search**: `”Google” “consumer” “litigation finance”`
– **Filters**: Topic = “Antitrust”, Date = 2022-2025
– **Goal**: Identify funders for consumer-focused Google cases.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of reduced choice and innovation.
– **Search**: `”Android” “tying” “funding”`
– **Filters**: Topic = “Collective Actions”
– **Goal**: Explore funding for Android-related claims.
– **Relevance**: Ties to barriers to entry and market control.
—
These strategies are tailored to each website’s content and search capabilities, ensuring granular evidence collection to support our case against Google. They target legal precedents, market data, academic analyses, and funding options, aligning with the causes of action and findings of infringement. Let me know how to proceed!
1. [https://consultas.oepm.es/](https://consultas.oepm.es/)
**Overview**: This is the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office’s online consultation portal. It offers searches for patents, utility models, and trademarks via the “Invenes” database, with advanced options like applicant name, classification (e.g., IPC), and date ranges.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `Titular: “Google” + Keywords: “publicidad digital”`
– **Filters**: Tipo de documento = “Patente”, Estado = “Vigente”, Fecha de solicitud = Last 10 years
– **Goal**: Identify Google’s active patents in digital advertising.
– **Relevance**: Demonstrates self-preferencing and market control in ad tech.
– **Search**: `Titular: “Google” + Keywords: “tecnología de anuncios” + Clasificación IPC: “G06Q 30/00″`
– **Filters**: Tipo de documento = “Modelo de Utilidad”, Fecha de publicación = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find utility models related to ad tech innovations (IPC G06Q 30/00 covers advertising).
– **Relevance**: Evidence of reduced competition and innovation.
– **Search**: `Keywords: “publicadores monetización” + Titular: “Google”`
– **Filters**: Tipo de documento = “Patente”, Estado = “Vigente”
– **Goal**: Locate patents impacting publisher monetization.
– **Relevance**: Ties to gross price effects and higher commissions.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `Titular: “Google” + Keywords: “búsqueda móvil”`
– **Filters**: Tipo de documento = “Patente”, Estado = “Vigente”, Fecha de solicitud = Last 10 years
– **Goal**: Identify patents on mobile search technologies.
– **Relevance**: Supports tying practices and market dominance.
– **Search**: `Titular: “Google” + Keywords: “Android integración búsqueda” + Clasificación IPC: “G06F 16/00″`
– **Filters**: Tipo de documento = “Patente”, Fecha de publicación = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find patents on Android search integration (IPC G06F 16/00 covers information retrieval).
– **Relevance**: Evidence of MADAs and barriers to entry.
– **Search**: `Titular: “Google” + Keywords: “búsqueda por defecto móvil”`
– **Filters**: Tipo de documento = “Modelo de Utilidad”, Estado = “Vigente”
– **Goal**: Explore patents on default search settings in mobile devices.
– **Relevance**: Ties to consumer harm and reduced choice.
—
### 2. [https://www.publicadorconcursal.es/](https://www.publicadorconcursal.es/)
**Overview**: The Spanish insolvency register provides public access to insolvency proceedings, including resolutions and extrajudicial agreements. It offers keyword searches with filters for type (e.g., resolutions, agreements) and date. Registration is required for full access.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”empresas publicidad digital” “concurso acreedores”`
– **Filters**: Tipo = “Resoluciones”, Fecha = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find ad tech companies in insolvency proceedings.
– **Relevance**: Supports harm from Google’s practices (e.g., umbrella effects).
– **Search**: `”Google” “acuerdo extrajudicial”`
– **Filters**: Tipo = “Acuerdos Extrajudiciales”, Estado = “Activo”
– **Goal**: Identify Google’s involvement in insolvency-related agreements.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of market influence and competition harm.
– **Search**: `”publicadores” “insolvencia”`
– **Filters**: Tipo = “Resoluciones”, Fecha = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Locate publishers in insolvency due to ad tech losses.
– **Relevance**: Ties to gross price effects and overhang damages.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”tecnología móvil” “concurso acreedores”`
– **Filters**: Tipo = “Resoluciones”, Fecha = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find mobile tech companies in insolvency.
– **Relevance**: Supports harm from Google’s mobile dominance.
– **Search**: `”Google” “acuerdo extrajudicial” “móvil”`
– **Filters**: Tipo = “Acuerdos Extrajudiciales”, Estado = “Activo”
– **Goal**: Identify Google’s role in mobile-related insolvency agreements.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of market control and tying practices.
– **Search**: `”consumidores” “insolvencia digital”`
– **Filters**: Tipo = “Resoluciones”, Fecha = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Explore consumer-facing digital companies in insolvency.
– **Relevance**: Ties to consumer harm and reduced choice.
—
### 3. [https://www.boe.es/buscar/concursos.php](https://www.boe.es/buscar/concursos.php)
**Overview**: The Spanish Official State Gazette’s insolvency search allows queries by keyword, date range, province, and type (e.g., voluntary or necessary insolvency). It’s a public database with no registration required.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”publicidad digital” “concurso acreedores”`
– **Filters**: Tipo = “Concurso Voluntario”, Rango de fechas = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find ad tech companies in voluntary insolvency.
– **Relevance**: Supports harm from Google’s ad tech dominance.
– **Search**: `”Google” “concurso” -inurl:(empleo)`
– **Filters**: Provincia = “Madrid”, Rango de fechas = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Identify Google-related insolvency cases in a tech hub (excluding job ads).
– **Relevance**: Evidence of market influence and competition harm.
– **Search**: `”editoriales digitales” “insolvencia”`
– **Filters**: Tipo = “Concurso Necesario”, Rango de fechas = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Locate publishers forced into insolvency.
– **Relevance**: Ties to gross price effects and overhang damages.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”tecnología móvil” “concurso acreedores”`
– **Filters**: Tipo = “Concurso Voluntario”, Rango de fechas = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find mobile tech companies in voluntary insolvency.
– **Relevance**: Supports harm from Google’s mobile dominance.
– **Search**: `”Google” “insolvencia” “móvil”`
– **Filters**: Provincia = “Barcelona”, Rango de fechas = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Identify Google-related insolvency cases in a tech hub.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of market control and tying practices.
– **Search**: `”consumidores digitales” “concurso”`
– **Filters**: Tipo = “Concurso Necesario”, Rango de fechas = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Explore consumer-facing digital companies in forced insolvency.
– **Relevance**: Ties to consumer harm and reduced choice.
—
### 4. [https://contrataciondelestado.es/](https://contrataciondelestado.es/)
**Overview**: Spain’s public procurement platform offers advanced searches by keyword, contracting authority, supplier, status (e.g., awarded), and CPV codes (procurement categories). Free access requires registration.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google” “publicidad”`
– **Filters**: Adjudicatario = “Google”, Estado = “Adjudicado”, CPV = “79340000” (Advertising services)
– **Goal**: Find public contracts awarded to Google for ad tech.
– **Relevance**: Supports market dominance and self-preferencing.
– **Search**: `”tecnología anuncios” “contratos”`
– **Filters**: CPV = “72000000” (IT services), Fecha de adjudicación = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Identify ad tech contracts awarded to competitors.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of competition harm and umbrella effects.
– **Search**: `”publicadores” “digital”`
– **Filters**: Órgano contratante = “Entidades Públicas”, Estado = “En ejecución”
– **Goal**: Explore active public contracts with publishers.
– **Relevance**: Ties to gross price effects and publisher harm.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”Google” “móvil”`
– **Filters**: Adjudicatario = “Google”, Estado = “Adjudicado”, CPV = “64200000” (Telecommunications)
– **Goal**: Find mobile tech contracts awarded to Google.
– **Relevance**: Supports tying practices and market control.
– **Search**: `”búsqueda móvil” “contratos”`
– **Filters**: CPV = “72300000” (Data services), Fecha de adjudicación = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Identify mobile search-related public contracts.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of barriers to entry and reduced choice.
– **Search**: `”consumidores” “tecnología”`
– **Filters**: Órgano contratante = “Administración General del Estado”, Estado = “En ejecución”
– **Goal**: Explore consumer-facing tech contracts in progress.
– **Relevance**: Ties to consumer harm and innovation reduction.
—
### 5. [https://www.infosubvenciones.es/](https://www.infosubvenciones.es/)
**Overview**: Spain’s subsidies database allows searches by keyword, beneficiary, sector (NACE codes), and date. It’s publicly accessible after accepting terms.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google” “subvención”`
– **Filters**: Sector = “J62″ (Computer programming), Fecha de concesión = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find subsidies to Google for ad tech projects.
– **Relevance**: Supports market dominance and self-preferencing.
– **Search**: `”publicidad digital” “financiación”`
– **Filters**: Beneficiario = “Empresas”, Sector = “M73″ (Advertising), Fecha = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Identify subsidies to ad tech competitors.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of competition harm and innovation support.
– **Search**: `”editoriales digitales” “subsidio”`
– **Filters**: Sector = “J58″ (Publishing), Fecha de concesión = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Explore subsidies to publishers for digital projects.
– **Relevance**: Ties to publisher harm and umbrella effects.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”Google” “móvil” “subvención”`
– **Filters**: Sector = “J61″ (Telecommunications), Fecha de concesión = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find subsidies to Google for mobile tech projects.
– **Relevance**: Supports tying practices and market control.
– **Search**: `”tecnología móvil” “financiación”`
– **Filters**: Beneficiario = “Empresas”, Sector = “J62″, Fecha = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Identify subsidies to mobile tech competitors.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of barriers to entry and innovation support.
– **Search**: `”consumidores digitales” “proyectos”`
– **Filters**: Sector = “J63” (Information services), Fecha de concesión = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Explore subsidies for consumer-facing digital projects.
– **Relevance**: Ties to consumer harm and reduced choice.
—
### 6. [https://www.registradores.org/](https://www.registradores.org/)
**Overview**: The Spanish Registrars’ Association website provides access to commercial and property registries. The commercial registry search (via “Servicios Online”) allows queries by company name or NIF, with paid access to detailed records.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google Spain SL”`
– **Filters**: Tipo = “Sociedades”, Estado = “Activa”
– **Goal**: Retrieve Google Spain’s commercial registry details.
– **Relevance**: Supports market presence and dominance in ad tech.
– **Search**: `”Alphabet Inc.”`
– **Filters**: Tipo = “Sociedades”, Fecha de inscripción = Last 10 years
– **Goal**: Identify Alphabet’s registered entities in Spain.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of market control and infrastructure.
– **Search**: `”publicidad digital” “empresas”`
– **Filters**: Actividad = “Tecnología”, Estado = “Activa”
– **Goal**: List active ad tech companies registered in Spain.
– **Relevance**: Ties to competition harm and publisher impacts.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”Google Spain SL” “móvil”`
– **Filters**: Tipo = “Sociedades”, Estado = “Activa”
– **Goal**: Find Google Spain’s mobile-related registry entries.
– **Relevance**: Supports tying practices and market dominance.
– **Search**: `”Android” “España”`
– **Filters**: Tipo = “Sociedades”, Fecha de inscripción = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Identify Android-related entities in Spain.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of MADAs and barriers to entry.
– **Search**: `”tecnología móvil” “consumidores”`
– **Filters**: Actividad = “Telecomunicaciones”, Estado = “Activa”
– **Goal**: List mobile tech companies serving consumers.
– **Relevance**: Ties to consumer harm and reduced choice.
—
### 7. [https://www.registradores.org/actualidad/portal-estadistico-registral/estadisticas-mercantiles](https://www.registradores.org/actualidad/portal-estadistico-registral/estadisticas-mercantiles)
**Overview**: The statistical portal offers aggregated data on company formations, mergers, and insolvencies, downloadable by year and sector (e.g., technology). No keyword search; data is browsable by category.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: Browse “Constituciones” > Sector = “Tecnología”
– **Filters**: Año = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Analyze trends in ad tech company formations.
– **Relevance**: Supports competition harm and innovation trends.
– **Search**: Browse “Fusiones” > Sector = “Tecnología”
– **Filters**: Año = Last 10 years
– **Goal**: Identify mergers in ad tech sectors.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of market consolidation and umbrella effects.
– **Search**: Browse “Concursos” > Sector = “Tecnología”
– **Filters**: Año = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Examine insolvencies in ad tech.
– **Relevance**: Ties to publisher harm and overhang damages.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: Browse “Constituciones” > Sector = “Telecomunicaciones”
– **Filters**: Año = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Analyze trends in mobile tech company formations.
– **Relevance**: Supports barriers to entry and innovation trends.
– **Search**: Browse “Fusiones” > Sector = “Telecomunicaciones”
– **Filters**: Año = Last 10 years
– **Goal**: Identify mergers in mobile tech sectors.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of market control and tying practices.
– **Search**: Browse “Concursos” > Sector = “Telecomunicaciones”
– **Filters**: Año = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Examine insolvencies in mobile tech.
– **Relevance**: Ties to consumer harm and reduced choice.
—
### 8. [http://app.bde.es/rss_www/](http://app.bde.es/rss_www/)
**Overview**: The Bank of Spain’s statistical database provides time series and reports on economic sectors. It supports keyword searches with filters for category (e.g., “Sectorial”), date, and format (e.g., Excel).
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”publicidad digital” “cuota mercado”`
– **Filters**: Categoría = “Sectorial”, Fecha = Last 5 years, Formato = “Series Temporales”
– **Goal**: Find market share data for digital advertising.
– **Relevance**: Supports market dominance and self-preferencing.
– **Search**: `”ingresos publicitarios” “tecnología”`
– **Filters**: Categoría = “Empresas”, Fecha = Last 10 years
– **Goal**: Identify revenue trends in ad tech.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of gross price effects and competition harm.
– **Search**: `”editoriales” “economía digital”`
– **Filters**: Categoría = “Informes”, Fecha = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Explore economic impacts on publishers.
– **Relevance**: Ties to publisher harm and umbrella effects.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”búsqueda móvil” “economía”`
– **Filters**: Categoría = “Sectorial”, Fecha = Last 5 years, Formato = “Series Temporales”
– **Goal**: Find economic data on mobile search markets.
– **Relevance**: Supports market control and tying practices.
– **Search**: `”tecnología móvil” “impacto económico”`
– **Filters**: Categoría = “Empresas”, Fecha = Last 10 years
– **Goal**: Identify economic trends in mobile tech.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of barriers to entry and innovation.
– **Search**: `”consumidores” “digital”`
– **Filters**: Categoría = “Informes”, Fecha = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Explore consumer behavior in digital markets.
– **Relevance**: Ties to consumer harm and reduced choice.
—
### 9. [https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions_en](https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions_en)
**Overview**: The EU trade policy page provides reports and agreements by country/region. It has a basic site search (via “Search this site”) with no advanced filters; content is browsable by region (e.g., United States).
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”digital services” “trade agreements” “United States”`
– **Filters**: Browse “United States” section, Date = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find trade agreements affecting digital advertising.
– **Relevance**: Supports market dominance and competition harm.
– **Search**: `”ad tech” “trade barriers” “Spain”`
– **Filters**: Browse “Spain” references, Date = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Identify trade barriers in ad tech markets.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of umbrella effects and publisher impacts.
– **Search**: `”Google” “trade policy”`
– **Filters**: Browse “Reports”, Date = Last 2 years
– **Goal**: Explore EU policy on Google’s market practices.
– **Relevance**: Ties to self-preferencing and market control.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”mobile technology” “trade agreements” “United States”`
– **Filters**: Browse “United States” section, Date = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find trade agreements affecting mobile search.
– **Relevance**: Supports tying practices and market dominance.
– **Search**: `”search engines” “trade disputes” “United Kingdom”`
– **Filters**: Browse “United Kingdom” section, Date = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Identify trade disputes related to search markets.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of barriers to entry and consumer harm.
– **Search**: `”consumer digital rights” “policy”`
– **Filters**: Browse “Policy Documents”, Date = Last 2 years
– **Goal**: Explore EU consumer protection policies in digital trade.
– **Relevance**: Ties to reduced choice and innovation.
—
These strategies are tailored to each website’s content and search capabilities, ensuring maximum granularity. By executing these searches, we can uncover new evidence—such as Google’s patent dominance, insolvency trends among competitors, public contracts, subsidies, and trade policy impacts—that directly supports our case in the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal. This comprehensive approach links each piece of potential evidence to specific causes of action and findings of infringement, strengthening our argument against Google’s market practices. Let me know if you need further refinement!
1. [https://www.pacer.gov/](https://www.pacer.gov/)
**Overview**: PACER provides access to US federal court documents. It offers advanced search by case type, jurisdiction, party name, and date (registration required).
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “ad tech” AND “antitrust”`
– **Filters**: Case Type = “Antitrust”, Jurisdiction = “District Courts”, Date Filed = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Identify cases alleging Google’s ad tech self-preferencing (e.g., DFP-AdX favoritism).
– **Relevance**: Supports gross price and take rate effects.
– **Search**: `”digital advertising” AND “publishers” AND “competition”`
– **Filters**: Case Type = “Civil”, Party Type = “Plaintiff: Publishers”
– **Goal**: Find lawsuits by publishers claiming harm from Google’s practices.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of umbrella effects and overhang damages.
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “self-preferencing” AND “advertising”`
– **Filters**: Nature of Suit = “Antitrust”, Date Filed = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Locate recent filings on self-preferencing in ad tech.
– **Relevance**: Ties to reduced competition and innovation.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “Android” AND “tying” AND “antitrust”`
– **Filters**: Case Type = “Antitrust”, Jurisdiction = “Appellate Courts”
– **Goal**: Retrieve cases on Android MADAs and tying practices.
– **Relevance**: Supports default search agreements and barriers to entry.
– **Search**: `”mobile search” AND “consumer harm” AND “Google”`
– **Filters**: Nature of Suit = “Consumer Rights”, Date Filed = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find cases documenting consumer impacts from mobile search dominance.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of reduced choice and innovation.
– **Search**: `”Apple” AND “Google” AND “default search” AND “agreement”`
– **Filters**: Case Type = “Antitrust”, Jurisdiction = “District Courts”
– **Goal**: Uncover litigation on Apple-Google exclusivity deals.
– **Relevance**: Ties to barriers to entry and consumer harm.
—
### 2. [https://www.usaspending.gov/](https://www.usaspending.gov/)
**Overview**: Tracks US federal spending with advanced search by agency, recipient, keyword, and fiscal year.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google” OR “Alphabet” AND “advertising”`
– **Filters**: Agency = “Department of Justice”, Award Type = “Contracts”, Fiscal Year = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find DOJ contracts related to ad tech investigations.
– **Relevance**: Supports self-preferencing and market dominance.
– **Search**: `”digital advertising” AND “competition”`
– **Filters**: Recipient = “Google LLC”, Award Type = “Grants”
– **Goal**: Identify federal funding tied to Google’s ad tech operations.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of gross price effects and reduced competition.
– **Search**: `”ad tech” AND “market analysis”`
– **Filters**: Award Type = “Research”, Agency = “Federal Trade Commission”
– **Goal**: Locate funded studies on ad tech competition.
– **Relevance**: Ties to innovation harm and umbrella effects.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “mobile technology”`
– **Filters**: Recipient = “Google LLC”, Award Type = “Contracts”, Fiscal Year = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Find mobile tech contracts reinforcing Google’s dominance.
– **Relevance**: Supports tying practices and default search agreements.
– **Search**: `”search engine” AND “consumer”`
– **Filters**: Agency = “General Services Administration”, Award Type = “Procurement”
– **Goal**: Identify federal reliance on Google’s search services.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of market control and barriers to entry.
– **Search**: `”digital consumer rights” AND “research”`
– **Filters**: Award Type = “Research”, Fiscal Year = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Uncover studies on consumer impacts in digital markets.
– **Relevance**: Ties to reduced choice and innovation.
—
### 3. [https://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/](https://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/)
**Overview**: WIPO’s global trademark database allows advanced search by keyword, class, jurisdiction, and status.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “ad tech”`
– **Filters**: Class = “35 (Advertising)”, Status = “Active”
– **Goal**: Identify trademarks for Google’s ad tech services (e.g., AdX, DFP).
– **Relevance**: Supports self-preferencing and market control.
– **Search**: `”digital advertising” AND “publishers”`
– **Filters**: Jurisdiction = “EU”, Class = “35 (Advertising)”
– **Goal**: Find EU trademarks in ad tech affecting publishers.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of competition harm and umbrella effects.
– **Search**: `”publisher monetization” AND “Google”`
– **Filters**: Status = “Active”, Class = “36 (Financial Services)”
– **Goal**: Locate trademarks related to publisher revenue tools.
– **Relevance**: Ties to gross price effects and take rate effects.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “mobile search”`
– **Filters**: Class = “9 (Software)”, Jurisdiction = “US”
– **Goal**: Identify trademarks for Google’s mobile search technologies.
– **Relevance**: Supports tying practices and market dominance.
– **Search**: `”Android” AND “search”`
– **Filters**: Class = “42 (Technology Services)”, Status = “Active”
– **Goal**: Find Android-related trademarks tied to search.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of MADAs and barriers to entry.
– **Search**: `”consumer search” AND “mobile”`
– **Filters**: Class = “35 (Advertising)”, Jurisdiction = “Global”
– **Goal**: Explore trademarks on consumer-facing search tools.
– **Relevance**: Ties to reduced consumer choice.
—
### 4. [https://www.openownership.org/en/register/](https://www.openownership.org/en/register/)
**Overview**: Global beneficial ownership database with search by company name, jurisdiction, and status.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google”`
– **Filters**: Jurisdiction = “UK”, Status = “Active”
– **Goal**: Find ownership details of Google’s UK ad tech entities.
– **Relevance**: Supports market dominance and self-preferencing.
– **Search**: `”DoubleClick”`
– **Filters**: Jurisdiction = “US”, Status = “Active”
– **Goal**: Identify ownership post-acquisition by Google.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of ad tech control and competition harm.
– **Search**: `”ad tech” AND “publishers”`
– **Filters**: Jurisdiction = “EU”
– **Goal**: Explore ownership of competing ad tech firms.
– **Relevance**: Ties to umbrella effects and innovation harm.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”Google”`
– **Filters**: Jurisdiction = “US”, Status = “Active”
– **Goal**: Find ownership of mobile search-related entities.
– **Relevance**: Supports market dominance and tying practices.
– **Search**: `”Android”`
– **Filters**: Jurisdiction = “Global”
– **Goal**: Identify Android-related ownership structures.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of MADAs and barriers to entry.
– **Search**: `”mobile technology” AND “search”`
– **Filters**: Jurisdiction = “UK”
– **Goal**: Explore ownership of mobile search competitors.
– **Relevance**: Ties to consumer harm and reduced choice.
—
### 5. [https://www.infocif.es/](https://www.infocif.es/)
**Overview**: Spanish company database with search by name, sector, and financial data (some features require registration).
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google Spain” OR “Google España”`
– **Filters**: Sector = “Tecnología”, Financials = “Revenue”
– **Goal**: Find financials of Google’s Spanish ad tech operations.
– **Relevance**: Supports market dominance and gross price effects.
– **Search**: `”publicidad digital”`
– **Filters**: Sector = “Publicidad”, Status = “Activa”
– **Goal**: Identify Spanish ad tech firms’ revenue trends.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of take rate effects and competition harm.
– **Search**: `”editoriales” AND “digital”`
– **Filters**: Sector = “Medios”, Financials = “Profit”
– **Goal**: Explore financial impacts on Spanish publishers.
– **Relevance**: Ties to umbrella effects and overhang damages.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”Google Spain” OR “Google España”`
– **Filters**: Sector = “Telecomunicaciones”, Financials = “Market Share”
– **Goal**: Assess Google’s mobile search dominance in Spain.
– **Relevance**: Supports default search agreements and market control.
– **Search**: `”búsqueda móvil”`
– **Filters**: Sector = “Tecnología”, Status = “Activa”
– **Goal**: Identify mobile search-related companies in Spain.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of tying practices and barriers to entry.
– **Search**: `”consumidores digitales”`
– **Filters**: Sector = “Internet”, Financials = “Revenue”
– **Goal**: Explore firms impacted by mobile search dominance.
– **Relevance**: Ties to consumer harm and reduced choice.
—
### 6. [https://www.hacienda.gob.es/es-ES/SecretariaDeEstadoDeFuncionPublica/OficinaConflictoIntereses/Paginas/DeclaracionesdealtoscargosdelaAGE.aspx](https://www.hacienda.gob.es/es-ES/SecretariaDeEstadoDeFuncionPublica/OficinaConflictoIntereses/Paginas/DeclaracionesdealtoscargosdelaAGE.aspx)
**Overview**: Spanish conflict of interest declarations with search by official name, position, or keyword (PDF-based).
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google” OR “Alphabet”`
– **Filters**: Position = “Ministerio de Economía”, Declaration Type = “Intereses”
– **Goal**: Find officials with ties to Google’s ad tech operations.
– **Relevance**: Supports market influence and self-preferencing.
– **Search**: `”publicidad” AND “digital”`
– **Filters**: Date = Last 3 years, Declaration Type = “Bienes”
– **Goal**: Identify officials with ad tech-related assets.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of competition harm.
– **Search**: `”competencia” AND “mercado”`
– **Filters**: Position = “Alta Dirección”, Date = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Explore declarations on market competition issues.
– **Relevance**: Ties to innovation harm and publisher impacts.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”Google” OR “Android”`
– **Filters**: Position = “Ministerio de Consumo”, Declaration Type = “Intereses”
– **Goal**: Find ties to mobile search or consumer tech.
– **Relevance**: Supports consumer harm and market control.
– **Search**: `”tecnología móvil”`
– **Filters**: Date = Last 5 years, Declaration Type = “Bienes”
– **Goal**: Identify officials with mobile tech interests.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of tying practices.
– **Search**: `”protección consumidor”`
– **Filters**: Position = “Ministerio de Consumo”, Date = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Explore consumer protection declarations.
– **Relevance**: Ties to reduced choice and innovation.
—
### 7. [https://www.congresodiputados.es/](https://www.congresodiputados.es/)
**Overview**: Spanish Congress site with search for debates, questions, and reports by keyword, date, and type.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “publicidad”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Sesiones Plenarias”, Date = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Find debates on Google’s ad tech practices.
– **Relevance**: Supports self-preferencing and gross price effects.
– **Search**: `”competencia digital” AND “anuncios”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Informes”, Date = Last 2 years
– **Goal**: Identify reports on digital ad competition.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of innovation harm and umbrella effects.
– **Search**: `”editoriales digitales” AND “Google”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Proposiciones no de Ley”, Date = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Explore proposals protecting publishers.
– **Relevance**: Ties to publisher harm and overhang damages.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “móvil”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Preguntas Escritas”, Date = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Find questions on mobile search dominance.
– **Relevance**: Supports default search agreements and market control.
– **Search**: `”consumidores digitales” AND “búsqueda”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Informes”, Date = Last 2 years
– **Goal**: Identify reports on digital consumer rights.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of reduced choice and innovation.
– **Search**: `”Android” AND “competencia”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Sesiones de Comisión”, Date = Last 4 years
– **Goal**: Explore discussions on Android tying.
– **Relevance**: Ties to barriers to entry and consumer harm.
—
### 8. [https://www.cnmv.es/](https://www.cnmv.es/)
**Overview**: Spanish securities regulator with search for financial reports, sanctions, and consultations.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google” OR “Alphabet”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Informes Financieros”, Date = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find Google’s Spanish financials tied to ad tech.
– **Relevance**: Supports market dominance and gross price effects.
– **Search**: `”publicidad digital” AND “competencia”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Sanciones”, Date = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Identify sanctions on ad practices.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of self-preferencing and competition harm.
– **Search**: `”mercado digital” AND “anuncios”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Consultas Públicas”, Date = Last 4 years
– **Goal**: Explore market competition consultations.
– **Relevance**: Ties to innovation harm and take rate effects.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “móvil”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Documentos Regulatorios”, Date = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find filings on mobile search operations.
– **Relevance**: Supports market control and tying practices.
– **Search**: `”tecnología móvil” AND “consumidores”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Informes”, Date = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Identify mobile tech market reports.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of consumer harm and barriers to entry.
– **Search**: `”consumidores digitales” AND “búsqueda”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Consultas”, Date = Last 2 years
– **Goal**: Explore digital consumer issue consultations.
– **Relevance**: Ties to reduced choice and innovation.
—
### 9. [https://www.cnmc.es/](https://www.cnmc.es/)
**Overview**: Spanish competition authority with search for resolutions, reports, and case files by keyword and type.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “publicidad”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Resoluciones”, Date = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find decisions on Google’s ad tech practices.
– **Relevance**: Supports self-preferencing and gross price effects.
– **Search**: `”competencia digital” AND “anuncios”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Informes de Mercado”, Date = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Identify digital ad competition studies.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of innovation harm and umbrella effects.
– **Search**: `”editoriales online” AND “Google”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Consultas”, Date = Last 4 years
– **Goal**: Explore publisher-related competition issues.
– **Relevance**: Ties to publisher harm and overhang damages.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”Google” AND “móvil”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Expedientes Sancionadores”, Date = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find case files on mobile search dominance.
– **Relevance**: Supports default search agreements and market control.
– **Search**: `”consumidores digitales” AND “búsqueda”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Informes”, Date = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Identify digital consumer impact reports.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of reduced choice and innovation.
– **Search**: `”Android” AND “competencia”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Resoluciones”, Date = Last 4 years
– **Goal**: Explore decisions on Android tying.
– **Relevance**: Ties to barriers to entry and consumer harm.
—
### 10. [https://transparencia.gencat.cat/](https://transparencia.gencat.cat/)
**Overview**: Catalan transparency portal with search for contracts, subsidies, and open data by keyword and type.
**Strategies**:
– **Ad Tech – Publishers**
– **Search**: `”Google” OR “Alphabet”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Contractes”, Date = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find Catalan contracts with Google for ad tech.
– **Relevance**: Supports market dominance and self-preferencing.
– **Search**: `”publicitat digital”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Subvencions”, Date = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Identify subsidies for digital ad initiatives.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of competition landscape and gross price effects.
– **Search**: `”editorials catalans” AND “digital”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Dades Obertes”, Date = Last 4 years
– **Goal**: Explore data on Catalan publishers’ digital operations.
– **Relevance**: Ties to publisher harm and umbrella effects.
– **Mobile Search – Consumers**
– **Search**: `”tecnologia mòbil” AND “Google”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Contractes”, Date = Last 5 years
– **Goal**: Find mobile tech contracts with Google.
– **Relevance**: Supports tying practices and market control.
– **Search**: `”consumidors digitals” AND “búsqueda”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Informes”, Date = Last 3 years
– **Goal**: Identify reports on digital consumer issues.
– **Relevance**: Evidence of consumer harm and reduced choice.
– **Search**: `”cercadors per defecte”`
– **Filters**: Type = “Dades Obertes”, Date = Last 4 years
– **Goal**: Explore data on default search usage in Catalonia.
– **Relevance**: Ties to default search agreements and barriers to entry.
—
## Conclusion
These strategies leverage each website’s advanced search capabilities and combine precise keywords with filters to target evidence supporting our causes of action and findings of infringement. By focusing on jurisdiction-specific data (e.g., UK, EU, US, Spain, Catalonia), we can build a robust case demonstrating Google’s market dominance and its adverse effects on publishers and consumers. This granular approach ensures we extract maximum value from each resource to bolster our position in the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal. Let me know if further adjustments are needed!
COAS Causes of Action
1. **Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**:
– Self-preferencing in the ad tech stack (e.g., DFP favoring AdX).
– Depressed ad prices and higher commissions for publishers.
– Harm through reduced competition and innovation.
2. **Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**:
– Tying Google Search and Chrome to Android via Mobile Application Distribution Agreements (MADAs).
– Exclusivity agreements with Apple for default search status.
– Reduced consumer choice, innovation, and search quality.
FOIS Findings of Infringement
– **Ad Tech Case**:
– Gross price effect: Lower revenues from ad auctions.
– Take rate effect: Higher supply-side platform (SSP) commissions.
– Umbrella effects: Losses in direct sales and other networks.
– Overhang damages: Persistent harm post-abuse.
– **Mobile Search Case**:
– Default search agreements limiting competition.
– Barriers to entry for rival search engines.
– Consumer harm through reduced choice and innovation.
—
## Search Strategies by Link
### 1. [https://www.ajbell.co.uk/markets/investment-trusts](https://www.ajbell.co.uk/markets/investment-trusts)
**Overview**: This page provides information on investment trusts, including performance data and market insights. It includes a basic search function for trusts and filters for sectors.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”digital advertising”` in the trust search bar.
– **Goal**: Identify trusts investing in ad tech firms impacted by Google’s self-preferencing (e.g., DFP-AdX integration).
– **Rationale**: Trusts with ad tech exposure may show revenue declines tied to gross price effects.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”Google” OR “Alphabet”` with a filter for technology-focused trusts.
– **Goal**: Assess Google’s market influence via trusts holding Alphabet stock, linking to higher SSP commissions.
– **Rationale**: Performance data could reflect market power in ad tech.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”publisher revenue”` or `”media trusts”`.
– **Goal**: Find trusts affected by depressed ad prices and umbrella effects on publisher earnings.
– **Rationale**: Evidence of revenue loss supports findings of infringement.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”mobile technology”` with a technology sector filter.
– **Goal**: Identify trusts exposed to mobile search markets affected by Google’s tying practices.
– **Rationale**: Links to consumer harm via reduced innovation.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”Google mobile”`.
– **Goal**: Find trusts with holdings tied to Google’s mobile dominance (e.g., Android ecosystem).
– **Rationale**: Ties to default search agreements and barriers to entry.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”consumer tech innovation”`.
– **Goal**: Explore trusts impacted by stifled competition in mobile search.
– **Rationale**: Evidence of reduced consumer choice and innovation.
—
### 2. [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/)
**Overview**: The UK government’s publications hub offers an advanced search with filters for policy area, organisation, date, and document type (e.g., reports, consultations).
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”digital advertising competition”`; Filter: Policy Area = `”Business and industry”`, Document Type = `”Reports”`.
– **Goal**: Find CMA or government reports on Google’s ad tech dominance (e.g., self-preferencing).
– **Rationale**: Supports gross price and take rate effects.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”Google ad tech investigation”`; Filter: Organisation = `”Competition and Markets Authority”`, Date = Last 5 years.
– **Goal**: Retrieve specific CMA investigations into ad tech practices.
– **Rationale**: Evidence of umbrella effects and overhang damages.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”publisher revenue digital markets”`; Filter: Policy Area = `”Digital”`.
– **Goal**: Uncover studies on publisher losses due to higher commissions and reduced competition.
– **Rationale**: Direct evidence of harm to publishers.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”mobile search competition”`; Filter: Policy Area = `”Consumer rights”`.
– **Goal**: Find reports on consumer impacts from Google’s mobile search practices.
– **Rationale**: Links to reduced choice and innovation.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”default search agreements”`; Filter: Document Type = `”Consultations”`.
– **Goal**: Identify consultations on exclusivity deals (e.g., Apple-Google).
– **Rationale**: Evidence of competition barriers.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”Google Android CMA”`; Filter: Organisation = `”Competition and Markets Authority”`.
– **Goal**: Locate CMA findings on Android tying and MADAs.
– **Rationale**: Supports consumer harm and barriers to entry.
—
### 3. [https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations](https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations)
**Overview**: Lists UK government organisations, each with its own search functionality for publications and cases.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Navigate to CMA page; Search `”digital advertising market study”`.
– **Goal**: Access the CMA’s market study on ad tech dominance.
– **Rationale**: Evidence of self-preferencing and gross price effects.
– **Strategy 2**: Go to DCMS page; Search `”ad tech dominance”`.
– **Goal**: Find policy papers on digital market competition.
– **Rationale**: Links to umbrella effects and innovation harm.
– **Strategy 3**: CMA page; Search `”publisher competition concerns”`.
– **Goal**: Retrieve case documents on publisher impacts.
– **Rationale**: Supports take rate effect and overhang damages.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Strategy 1**: CMA page; Search `”mobile search investigation”`.
– **Goal**: Find investigations into mobile search competition.
– **Rationale**: Evidence of default search agreements.
– **Strategy 2**: ICO page; Search `”consumer digital rights”`.
– **Goal**: Explore consumer protection angles in mobile search.
– **Rationale**: Ties to reduced choice and quality.
– **Strategy 3**: CMA page; Search `”Google Android case”`.
– **Goal**: Access enforcement actions on Android tying.
– **Rationale**: Supports barriers to entry and consumer harm.
—
### 4. [https://www.londonstockexchange.com/live-markets/market-data-dashboard/price-explorer](https://www.londonstockexchange.com/live-markets/market-data-dashboard/price-explorer)
**Overview**: The LSE’s price explorer allows searches for stocks and ETFs with filters for sector, market, and performance.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”Alphabet Inc.”`; Filter: Sector = `”Technology”`.
– **Goal**: Analyze Google’s stock trends tied to ad tech dominance.
– **Rationale**: Market power evidence for self-preferencing.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”digital advertising”`; Filter: Sector = `”Media”`.
– **Goal**: Identify ad tech firms impacted by Google’s practices.
– **Rationale**: Links to gross price and umbrella effects.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”publisher stocks”`.
– **Goal**: Find publisher-related securities showing revenue declines.
– **Rationale**: Supports take rate effect and publisher harm.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”mobile technology”`; Filter: Sector = `”Technology”`.
– **Goal**: Locate stocks tied to mobile search markets.
– **Rationale**: Evidence of tying and innovation harm.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”Google”`; Filter: Performance metrics.
– **Goal**: Assess Google’s valuation linked to mobile dominance.
– **Rationale**: Ties to default search agreements.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”consumer tech ETFs”`.
– **Goal**: Find ETFs affected by mobile search competition.
– **Rationale**: Supports consumer harm findings.
—
### 5. [https://www.bidstats.uk/](https://www.bidstats.uk/)
**Overview**: Tracks UK public sector tenders with advanced search by keyword, buyer, supplier, and status.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”digital advertising”`; Filter: Supplier = `”Google”`.
– **Goal**: Identify public contracts where Google dominates ad tech.
– **Rationale**: Evidence of self-preferencing and market control.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”ad tech services”`; Filter: Status = `”Awarded”`.
– **Goal**: Find awarded tenders showing Google’s influence.
– **Rationale**: Links to take rate and umbrella effects.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”media buying”`; Filter: Buyer = `”Media agencies”`.
– **Goal**: Explore contract patterns affecting publishers.
– **Rationale**: Supports gross price effect.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”mobile technology”`; Filter: Supplier = `”Google”`.
– **Goal**: Find tenders tied to Google’s mobile ecosystem.
– **Rationale**: Evidence of tying via MADAs.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”search services”`; Filter: Status = `”Active”`.
– **Goal**: Identify public sector reliance on Google search.
– **Rationale**: Ties to default search agreements.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”consumer digital platforms”`.
– **Goal**: Uncover consumer-facing contracts with Google.
– **Rationale**: Supports consumer harm and innovation reduction.
—
### 6. [https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_e.htm](https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_e.htm)
**Overview**: WTO dispute settlement page with searchable database by country, subject, and agreement.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”digital services”`; Filter: Country = `”United States”`.
– **Goal**: Find disputes on ad tech trade barriers involving Google.
– **Rationale**: Links to self-preferencing and competition harm.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”Google” OR “digital advertising”`.
– **Goal**: Identify trade disputes tied to ad tech dominance.
– **Rationale**: Evidence of umbrella effects.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”market access digital”`; Filter: Agreement = `”GATS”`.
– **Goal**: Explore broader digital market trade issues.
– **Rationale**: Supports findings of publisher harm.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”mobile technology”`; Filter: Subject = `”Consumer protection”`.
– **Goal**: Find disputes on mobile search consumer impacts.
– **Rationale**: Evidence of reduced choice.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”search engines”`.
– **Goal**: Identify trade disputes on search market dominance.
– **Rationale**: Ties to barriers to entry.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”digital trade agreements”`.
– **Goal**: Uncover policies affecting mobile search competition.
– **Rationale**: Supports innovation harm.
—
### 7. [https://www.oge.gov/](https://www.oge.gov/)
**Overview**: US Office of Government Ethics site with limited search; focuses on ethics disclosures and guidelines.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”Google” OR “Alphabet”` in ethics disclosures.
– **Goal**: Find conflicts of interest tied to ad tech dominance.
– **Rationale**: Indirect evidence of market influence.
– **Strategy 2**: Browse for `”digital advertising”` in ethics guidelines.
– **Goal**: Identify rules on tech sector lobbying.
– **Rationale**: Links to self-preferencing practices.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”lobbying tech sector”` in reports.
– **Goal**: Explore Google’s influence on policy.
– **Rationale**: Supports findings of competition harm.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”mobile technology”` in disclosures.
– **Goal**: Find Google-related ethics filings on mobile dominance.
– **Rationale**: Ties to tying practices.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”consumer protection”` in guidelines.
– **Goal**: Identify ethics rules relevant to digital markets.
– **Rationale**: Supports consumer harm claims.
– **Strategy 3**: Browse for `”Google executives”` in financial disclosures.
– **Goal**: Uncover ties to mobile search policies.
– **Rationale**: Evidence of market control.
—
### 8. [https://www.congress.gov/](https://www.congress.gov/)
**Overview**: US Congress database with advanced search for legislation, hearings, and reports by keyword, date, and type.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”Google ad tech”`; Filter: Type = `”Hearings”`.
– **Goal**: Find testimony on Google’s ad tech practices.
– **Rationale**: Evidence of self-preferencing and gross price effects.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”digital advertising competition”`; Filter: Type = `”Reports”`.
– **Goal**: Retrieve congressional studies on ad tech markets.
– **Rationale**: Supports umbrella effects and take rate issues.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”antitrust ad tech”`; Filter: Type = `”Bills”`.
– **Goal**: Identify proposed laws targeting ad tech dominance.
– **Rationale**: Links to overhang damages.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”Google mobile search”`; Filter: Type = `”Hearings”`.
– **Goal**: Find discussions on consumer impacts of mobile dominance.
– **Rationale**: Evidence of tying and reduced choice.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”mobile search dominance”`; Filter: Type = `”Bills”`.
– **Goal**: Identify consumer protection legislation.
– **Rationale**: Supports barriers to entry.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”default search agreements”`; Filter: Date = Last 5 years.
– **Goal**: Find legislative actions on exclusivity deals.
– **Rationale**: Ties to innovation harm.
—
### 9. [https://worldwide.espacenet.com/](https://worldwide.espacenet.com/)
**Overview**: Global patent database with advanced search by keyword, inventor, and classification (CPC).
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”Google” AND “digital advertising”` in Title/Abstract; Filter: CPC = `”G06Q” (data processing)`.
– **Goal**: Find patents on ad tech innovations (e.g., DFP-AdX).
– **Rationale**: Evidence of self-preferencing via technology.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”ad tech algorithms”`; Filter: Applicant = `”Google”`.
– **Goal**: Explore Google’s patent dominance in ad tech.
– **Rationale**: Links to competition harm.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”publisher monetization”`; Filter: Date = Last 10 years.
– **Goal**: Identify patents affecting publisher revenues.
– **Rationale**: Supports gross price and take rate effects.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”Google” AND “mobile search”`; Filter: CPC = `”H04W” (wireless communication)`.
– **Goal**: Find patents on mobile search defaults.
– **Rationale**: Evidence of tying via MADAs.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”Android search integration”`; Filter: Applicant = `”Google”`.
– **Goal**: Explore patents on Android search tying.
– **Rationale**: Supports barriers to entry.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”consumer search behavior”`; Filter: CPC = `”G06F” (computing)`.
– **Goal**: Find patents on mobile user interfaces.
– **Rationale**: Ties to consumer harm and innovation reduction.
—
### 10. [https://ppubs.uspto.gov/](https://ppubs.uspto.gov/)
**Overview**: USPTO patent search with advanced queries by keyword, date, assignee, and classification.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”Google” AND “ad tech”` in Claims; Filter: Assignee = `”Google”`.
– **Goal**: Identify key ad tech patents held by Google.
– **Rationale**: Evidence of self-preferencing technology.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”digital advertising auctions”`; Filter: Date = Last 10 years.
– **Goal**: Explore patents on auction mechanisms.
– **Rationale**: Links to gross price effects.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”publisher ad revenue”`; Filter: CPC = `”G06Q 30/00″ (advertising)`.
– **Goal**: Find patents impacting publisher earnings.
– **Rationale**: Supports take rate and umbrella effects.
– **Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Strategy 1**: Search `”Google” AND “mobile search”`; Filter: Assignee = `”Google”`.
– **Goal**: Identify consumer-facing mobile search patents.
– **Rationale**: Evidence of tying practices.
– **Strategy 2**: Search `”default search engine”`; Filter: CPC = `”G06F 16/00” (search systems)`.
– **Goal**: Explore patents on mobile defaults.
– **Rationale**: Supports default search agreements.
– **Strategy 3**: Search `”Android search integration”`; Filter: Date = Last 5 years.
– **Goal**: Find recent patents on Android tying.
– **Rationale**: Ties to consumer harm and barriers to entry.
—
## Conclusion
These search strategies are designed to maximize the extraction of granular, actionable evidence from each website. By combining targeted keywords with advanced search filters, we can uncover data, reports, patents, and market insights that directly support our case against Google. The strategies align with the causes of action and findings of infringement, ensuring relevance and precision in building our position for the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal. Let me know if you need further adjustments or deeper exploration!
Search Link: [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/register-of-consultant-lobbyists]
(https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/register-of-consultant-lobbyists)
This is the UK’s Register of Consultant Lobbyists, listing lobbying activities with ministers. It offers a basic search by lobbyist or client name, with quarterly data updates.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Enter “Google” or “Alphabet” in the search bar to find lobbyists representing Google in ad tech matters.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Use “digital advertising” or “ad tech” to identify lobbyists for related firms (e.g., DoubleClick), revealing industry lobbying trends.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Search “competition policy” to uncover lobbying on ad tech regulations.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Search “Google” or “Alphabet” to find lobbying on mobile search or Android policies.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Use “mobile technology” or “search engines” to identify lobbyists for competitors or consumer groups.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Search “consumer protection” to explore lobbying on mobile search consumer issues.
—
### Search Link: [https://www.lobbying.scot/](https://www.lobbying.scot/)
The Scottish Lobbying Register tracks lobbying with Scottish officials. It provides a search function with filters for organization, date, and keyword.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Search “Google” with “digital advertising” keyword filter to find ad tech lobbying in Scotland.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Use “ad tech” or “market regulation” to identify broader digital advertising lobbying.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Search “Scottish government” with “digital policy” to explore regional ad tech lobbying.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Search “Google” with “mobile search” filter to find mobile-related lobbying.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Use “consumer rights” or “mobile technology” to identify consumer-focused lobbying.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Search “Holyrood” with “digital markets” to uncover Scottish consumer protection lobbying.
—
### Search Link: [https://casetracker.justice.gov.uk/](https://casetracker.justice.gov.uk/)
This UK case tracker allows searches by court, case number, or party name, with no advanced filters beyond basic queries.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Search “Google” or “Alphabet” to find ad tech-related cases.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Use “digital advertising” or “competition law” to identify sector-specific legal disputes.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Search “abuse of dominance” to locate relevant competition cases.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Search “Google” or “Android” to find mobile search cases.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Use “mobile search” or “consumer rights” to identify consumer-related disputes.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Search “default search” to explore tying or exclusivity cases.
—
### Search Link: [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/royal-courts-of-justice-cause-list](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/royal-courts-of-justice-cause-list)
This lists upcoming hearings at the Royal Courts of Justice, browsable by date and court, with no search function.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Browse daily lists for “Google” or “digital advertising” in case descriptions.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Focus on Business and Property Courts for “ad tech” or “competition” mentions.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Check Commercial Court listings for “market dominance” cases.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Scan for “Google” or “mobile search” in hearing descriptions.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Look in Competition List for “digital markets” or “consumer rights” cases.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Check for “Android” or “search engine” references in upcoming hearings.
—
### Search Link: [https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/](https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/)
This UK tender portal offers advanced searches by keyword, sector, and value for public contracts.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Search “digital advertising” with “Technology” sector filter to find ad tech tenders.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Use “Google” with “contract awarded” status to identify public deals.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Search “media buying” to explore ad tech-related public contracts.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Search “mobile technology” with “Digital Services” filter for mobile search tenders.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Use “search services” or “Google” to find relevant public contracts.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Search “consumer digital platforms” to uncover consumer-facing tenders.
—
### Search Link: [https://www.lobbyfacts.eu/](https://www.lobbyfacts.eu/)
This EU lobbying database allows advanced searches by lobbyist, policy area, and expenditure.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Search “Google” with “Digital Single Market” policy filter for ad tech lobbying.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Use “digital advertising” or “ad tech” to find industry-wide lobbying efforts.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Search “competition policy” with “high expenditure” filter for major lobbying.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Search “Google” with “consumer protection” filter for mobile search lobbying.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Use “mobile technology” or “search engines” to identify consumer-related lobbying.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Search “Digital Markets Act” for EU lobbying on mobile markets.
—
### Search Link: [https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/home/en](https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/home/en)
The European Commission’s press corner offers a search with filters for date, topic, and keyword.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Search “Google ad tech” with “Competition” topic filter for investigation updates.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Use “digital advertising dominance” to find broader ad tech statements.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Search “Google fines” with recent date filter for penalty announcements.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Search “Google Android” with “Competition” filter for mobile search rulings.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Use “mobile search consumer” to find consumer protection releases.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Search “Digital Markets Act” for mobile market regulation news.
—
### Search Link: [https://ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr/](https://ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr/)
The EU’s Online Dispute Resolution platform resolves consumer disputes but lacks a public dispute search.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Review platform guidance for “digital services” or “search engine” complaint trends.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Check FAQs or examples for “Google” or “mobile technology” disputes.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Explore “consumer rights” sections for digital market complaint insights.
*Note:* No public search exists; strategies rely on browsing available content.
—
### Search Link: [https://europa.eu/youreurope/business/finance-funding/getting-funding/tenders/index_en.htm](https://europa.eu/youreurope/business/finance-funding/getting-funding/tenders/index_en.htm)
This EU tender page links to TED, with advanced searches by keyword, sector, and country.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Search “digital advertising” in TED with “IT” sector filter for ad tech contracts.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Use “Google” with “contract awarded” filter to find EU public deals.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Search “media services” for ad tech-related tenders.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Search “mobile technology” in TED with “Digital” filter for mobile search tenders.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Use “search services” or “Google” to identify relevant contracts.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Search “consumer digital” for consumer-facing public tenders.
—
### Search Link: [https://www.ajbell.co.uk/market-research/screener/shares](https://www.ajbell.co.uk/market-research/screener/shares)
This stock screener filters shares by sector and metrics, requiring a login for full access.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Filter for “Alphabet Inc.” in “Technology” sector to analyze ad tech financials.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Compare “Google” with ad tech firms (e.g., Trade Desk) via revenue metrics.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Screen “Media” sector for dominance indicators.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search Strategy 1:** Filter “Alphabet Inc.” for mobile revenue or market cap data.
– **Search Strategy 2:** Compare “Google” with “Apple” or “Microsoft” in mobile tech metrics.
– **Search Strategy 3:** Screen “Technology” for consumer tech dominance trends.
*Note:* Full data requires login; strategies assume basic access.
—
These strategies leverage each site’s functionality to gather evidence on Google’s anti-competitive practices in ad tech and mobile search, supporting our case before the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal. Let me know if you need further refinement!
Search Link: [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/)
This is the official database for EU law, case law, and the Official Journal, offering advanced search options with filters for document type, date, and EuroVoc thesaurus terms. Advanced search rules allow combining free text, metadata, and Boolean operators for registered users.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Use “Google digital advertising abuse of dominance” in the advanced search, selecting “Case law” document type and “Competition” EuroVoc domain to find rulings like Google Shopping (AT.39740) that establish self-preferencing as an abuse.
– **Search 2:** Search “ad tech market competition” with “Legislation” type and “Digital economy” EuroVoc sub-domain to identify regulations addressing ad tech dominance.
– **Search 3:** Combine “Google ad tech” and “Article 102 TFEU” using Boolean operators, filtering for “Official Journal” to find notices of investigations or fines.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google Android case” with “Case law” type and “Competition” EuroVoc domain to retrieve the AT.40099 decision on mobile search tying.
– **Search 2:** Use “mobile search default agreements” with “Legislation” type and “Consumer protection” EuroVoc to find consumer-focused regulations.
– **Search 3:** Search “Google consumer choice mobile” with “Preparatory acts” to explore proposed laws addressing mobile search dominance.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EUR-Lex)
—
### Search Link: [https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/business-and-property-courts](https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/business-and-property-courts)
This page details the Business and Property Courts of England and Wales, handling competition disputes, but lacks a direct search function. I’ll propose searches based on accessing case lists or judgments via linked resources.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Navigate to case lists or judgments and search “Google ad tech competition” to find UK court rulings on ad tech dominance.
– **Search 2:** Look for “digital advertising abuse of dominance” in court archives to identify publisher-related competition disputes.
– **Search 3:** Search “Google publisher claims” in related court documents to find cases supporting publisher losses.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google mobile search case” in court records to find consumer-focused competition rulings.
– **Search 2:** Use “mobile search consumer harm” to explore judgments on reduced consumer choice.
– **Search 3:** Look for “default search agreements UK” in case summaries to find relevant legal actions.
—
### Search Link: [https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/advanced-search](https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/advanced-search)
This is the Companies House advanced search for UK company data, allowing filters for company name, status, SIC code, and date. Rules emphasize precise terms and available filters for active or dissolved companies.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google UK Limited” with SIC code 73120 (Media representation services) to find ad tech financials or ownership details.
– **Search 2:** Use “DoubleClick” with “Active” status to explore acquisition records impacting ad tech markets.
– **Search 3:** Search “Alphabet Inc.” with “Filing history” filter to find ad tech-related financial disclosures.[](https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/)
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google UK Limited” with SIC code 62090 (Other IT service activities) for mobile search operations data.
– **Search 2:** Use “Android UK” with “Active” status to find mobile ecosystem company filings.
– **Search 3:** Search “Alphabet Inc.” with “Directors” filter to identify executives linked to consumer market strategies.
—
### Search Link: [https://resources.companieshouse.gov.uk/sic/](https://resources.companieshouse.gov.uk/sic/)
This page lists Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes for UK company activities, with no direct search function but a downloadable list for reference.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Use the SIC code list to identify 73120 (Media representation services) and cross-reference with Companies House searches for ad tech firms.
– **Search 2:** Look for 62012 (Business software development) to find ad tech platform providers affected by Google’s dominance.
– **Search 3:** Search for 63110 (Data processing, hosting) to identify competitors in ad tech infrastructure.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Use SIC code 62090 (Other IT service activities) to find mobile search-related companies in Companies House searches.
– **Search 2:** Look for 58290 (Other software publishing) to identify mobile app providers impacted by search defaults.
– **Search 3:** Search for 61900 (Other telecommunications activities) to explore mobile ecosystem players.[](https://resources.companieshouse.gov.uk/sic/)
—
### Search Link: [https://petition.parliament.uk/](https://petition.parliament.uk/)
This UK Parliament petition site allows searching for public petitions, with a simple search bar and filters for status (e.g., open, closed).
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google ad tech” to find petitions on digital advertising market issues.
– **Search 2:** Use “digital advertising competition” with “Open” filter to identify active public support for publisher claims.
– **Search 3:** Search “publisher rights Google” to find petitions addressing ad tech harm.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google mobile search” to find consumer-focused petitions on search dominance.
– **Search 2:** Use “consumer rights digital” with “Closed with response” filter to explore government responses to mobile search issues.
– **Search 3:** Search “default search engine” to find public calls for consumer choice protections.
—
### Search Link: [https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-financial-interests/parliamentary-commissioner-for-standards/registers-of-interests/register-of-members-financial-interests/](https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-financial-interests/parliamentary-commissioner-for-standards/registers-of-interests/register-of-members-financial-interests/)
This page hosts the Register of Members’ Financial Interests, searchable for MPs’ financial ties.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google” to find MPs with financial ties to Google or ad tech firms.
– **Search 2:** Use “digital advertising” to identify MPs with interests in related industries.
– **Search 3:** Search “Alphabet Inc.” to uncover political connections influencing ad tech policy.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google mobile” for MPs with ties to mobile tech or consumer services.
– **Search 2:** Use “search engine” to find financial interests in digital consumer markets.
– **Search 3:** Search “Android” to explore MP connections to mobile ecosystems.
—
### Search Link: [https://www.theyworkforyou.com/interests/](https://www.theyworkforyou.com/interests/)
This site aggregates MPs’ financial interests, offering a search function for parliamentary ties.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google ad tech” to find MPs with ties to Google’s advertising operations.
– **Search 2:** Use “digital media” to identify interests in ad tech-related sectors.
– **Search 3:** Search “publisher advocacy” to find MPs supporting publisher rights.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google mobile” for MPs with mobile tech financial ties.
– **Search 2:** Use “consumer digital rights” to find MPs advocating for consumer protections.
– **Search 3:** Search “mobile search” to explore political influence on consumer markets.
—
### Search Link: [https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/](https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/)
This is the European Court of Human Rights database, with advanced search options for case law, including keywords and article filters.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google competition” with “Article 10” (freedom of expression) filter to explore publisher rights cases.
– **Search 2:** Use “digital market dominance” to find cases on economic freedoms impacted by ad tech.
– **Search 3:** Search “ad tech monopoly” with “Business rights” context to identify relevant precedents.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google consumer rights” with “Article 8” (privacy) filter to find mobile search-related cases.
– **Search 2:** Use “mobile technology dominance” to explore consumer harm precedents.
– **Search 3:** Search “default settings human rights” to find cases on consumer choice restrictions.
—
### Search Link: [https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law/have-your-say](https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law/have-your-say)
This EU public consultation page allows feedback on proposed laws, with a search function for initiatives.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “digital markets act” to find consultations on ad tech regulation.
– **Search 2:** Use “Google ad tech consultation” to explore public input on dominance issues.
– **Search 3:** Search “publisher protections digital” for initiatives addressing ad tech harm.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “mobile search regulation” to find consumer-focused digital policies.
– **Search 2:** Use “Google consumer choice” to explore consultations on search defaults.
– **Search 3:** Search “digital consumer rights” for broader consumer protection initiatives.
—
### Search Link: [https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/](https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/)
This UK National Archives site hosts legislation and records, with an advanced search for keywords, dates, and record types.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google competition law” with “Legislation” type to find UK ad tech regulations.
– **Search 2:** Use “digital advertising records” with recent dates to explore government ad tech policies.
– **Search 3:** Search “publisher competition issues” to find historical data on market dominance.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “mobile search regulation” with “Legislation” type for consumer protections.
– **Search 2:** Use “Google consumer harm” to find records of mobile search investigations.
– **Search 3:** Search “default search agreements” to explore consumer market policy archives.[](https://www.legislation.gov.uk/)
—
This response provides granular search strategies for each search link, tailored to both causes of action, leveraging each site’s functionality to uncover evidence. I couldn’t fully access some databases (e.g., ECHR, National Archives) to test searches, but strategies are based on their described structures. Let me know how to proceed!
Search Link: [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/)
This is the official database for EU law, case law, and the Official Journal, offering advanced search options with filters for document type, date, and EuroVoc thesaurus terms. Advanced search rules allow combining free text, metadata, and Boolean operators for registered users.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Use “Google digital advertising abuse of dominance” in the advanced search, selecting “Case law” document type and “Competition” EuroVoc domain to find rulings like Google Shopping (AT.39740) that establish self-preferencing as an abuse.
– **Search 2:** Search “ad tech market competition” with “Legislation” type and “Digital economy” EuroVoc sub-domain to identify regulations addressing ad tech dominance.
– **Search 3:** Combine “Google ad tech” and “Article 102 TFEU” using Boolean operators, filtering for “Official Journal” to find notices of investigations or fines.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google Android case” with “Case law” type and “Competition” EuroVoc domain to retrieve the AT.40099 decision on mobile search tying.
– **Search 2:** Use “mobile search default agreements” with “Legislation” type and “Consumer protection” EuroVoc to find consumer-focused regulations.
– **Search 3:** Search “Google consumer choice mobile” with “Preparatory acts” to explore proposed laws addressing mobile search dominance.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EUR-Lex)
—
### Search Link: [https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/business-and-property-courts](https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/business-and-property-courts)
This page details the Business and Property Courts of England and Wales, handling competition disputes, but lacks a direct search function. I’ll propose searches based on accessing case lists or judgments via linked resources.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Navigate to case lists or judgments and search “Google ad tech competition” to find UK court rulings on ad tech dominance.
– **Search 2:** Look for “digital advertising abuse of dominance” in court archives to identify publisher-related competition disputes.
– **Search 3:** Search “Google publisher claims” in related court documents to find cases supporting publisher losses.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google mobile search case” in court records to find consumer-focused competition rulings.
– **Search 2:** Use “mobile search consumer harm” to explore judgments on reduced consumer choice.
– **Search 3:** Look for “default search agreements UK” in case summaries to find relevant legal actions.
—
### Search Link: [https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/advanced-search](https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/advanced-search)
This is the Companies House advanced search for UK company data, allowing filters for company name, status, SIC code, and date. Rules emphasize precise terms and available filters for active or dissolved companies.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google UK Limited” with SIC code 73120 (Media representation services) to find ad tech financials or ownership details.
– **Search 2:** Use “DoubleClick” with “Active” status to explore acquisition records impacting ad tech markets.
– **Search 3:** Search “Alphabet Inc.” with “Filing history” filter to find ad tech-related financial disclosures.[](https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/)
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google UK Limited” with SIC code 62090 (Other IT service activities) for mobile search operations data.
– **Search 2:** Use “Android UK” with “Active” status to find mobile ecosystem company filings.
– **Search 3:** Search “Alphabet Inc.” with “Directors” filter to identify executives linked to consumer market strategies.
—
### Search Link: [https://resources.companieshouse.gov.uk/sic/](https://resources.companieshouse.gov.uk/sic/)
This page lists Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes for UK company activities, with no direct search function but a downloadable list for reference.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Use the SIC code list to identify 73120 (Media representation services) and cross-reference with Companies House searches for ad tech firms.
– **Search 2:** Look for 62012 (Business software development) to find ad tech platform providers affected by Google’s dominance.
– **Search 3:** Search for 63110 (Data processing, hosting) to identify competitors in ad tech infrastructure.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Use SIC code 62090 (Other IT service activities) to find mobile search-related companies in Companies House searches.
– **Search 2:** Look for 58290 (Other software publishing) to identify mobile app providers impacted by search defaults.
– **Search 3:** Search for 61900 (Other telecommunications activities) to explore mobile ecosystem players.[](https://resources.companieshouse.gov.uk/sic/)
—
### Search Link: [https://petition.parliament.uk/](https://petition.parliament.uk/)
This UK Parliament petition site allows searching for public petitions, with a simple search bar and filters for status (e.g., open, closed).
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google ad tech” to find petitions on digital advertising market issues.
– **Search 2:** Use “digital advertising competition” with “Open” filter to identify active public support for publisher claims.
– **Search 3:** Search “publisher rights Google” to find petitions addressing ad tech harm.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google mobile search” to find consumer-focused petitions on search dominance.
– **Search 2:** Use “consumer rights digital” with “Closed with response” filter to explore government responses to mobile search issues.
– **Search 3:** Search “default search engine” to find public calls for consumer choice protections.
—
### Search Link: [https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-financial-interests/parliamentary-commissioner-for-standards/registers-of-interests/register-of-members-financial-interests/](https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-financial-interests/parliamentary-commissioner-for-standards/registers-of-interests/register-of-members-financial-interests/)
This page hosts the Register of Members’ Financial Interests, searchable for MPs’ financial ties.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google” to find MPs with financial ties to Google or ad tech firms.
– **Search 2:** Use “digital advertising” to identify MPs with interests in related industries.
– **Search 3:** Search “Alphabet Inc.” to uncover political connections influencing ad tech policy.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google mobile” for MPs with ties to mobile tech or consumer services.
– **Search 2:** Use “search engine” to find financial interests in digital consumer markets.
– **Search 3:** Search “Android” to explore MP connections to mobile ecosystems.
—
### Search Link: [https://www.theyworkforyou.com/interests/](https://www.theyworkforyou.com/interests/)
This site aggregates MPs’ financial interests, offering a search function for parliamentary ties.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google ad tech” to find MPs with ties to Google’s advertising operations.
– **Search 2:** Use “digital media” to identify interests in ad tech-related sectors.
– **Search 3:** Search “publisher advocacy” to find MPs supporting publisher rights.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google mobile” for MPs with mobile tech financial ties.
– **Search 2:** Use “consumer digital rights” to find MPs advocating for consumer protections.
– **Search 3:** Search “mobile search” to explore political influence on consumer markets.
—
### Search Link: [https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/](https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/)
This is the European Court of Human Rights database, with advanced search options for case law, including keywords and article filters.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google competition” with “Article 10” (freedom of expression) filter to explore publisher rights cases.
– **Search 2:** Use “digital market dominance” to find cases on economic freedoms impacted by ad tech.
– **Search 3:** Search “ad tech monopoly” with “Business rights” context to identify relevant precedents.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google consumer rights” with “Article 8” (privacy) filter to find mobile search-related cases.
– **Search 2:** Use “mobile technology dominance” to explore consumer harm precedents.
– **Search 3:** Search “default settings human rights” to find cases on consumer choice restrictions.
—
### Search Link: [https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law/have-your-say](https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law/have-your-say)
This EU public consultation page allows feedback on proposed laws, with a search function for initiatives.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “digital markets act” to find consultations on ad tech regulation.
– **Search 2:** Use “Google ad tech consultation” to explore public input on dominance issues.
– **Search 3:** Search “publisher protections digital” for initiatives addressing ad tech harm.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “mobile search regulation” to find consumer-focused digital policies.
– **Search 2:** Use “Google consumer choice” to explore consultations on search defaults.
– **Search 3:** Search “digital consumer rights” for broader consumer protection initiatives.
—
### Search Link: [https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/](https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/)
This UK National Archives site hosts legislation and records, with an advanced search for keywords, dates, and record types.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google competition law” with “Legislation” type to find UK ad tech regulations.
– **Search 2:** Use “digital advertising records” with recent dates to explore government ad tech policies.
– **Search 3:** Search “publisher competition issues” to find historical data on market dominance.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “mobile search regulation” with “Legislation” type for consumer protections.
– **Search 2:** Use “Google consumer harm” to find records of mobile search investigations.
– **Search 3:** Search “default search agreements” to explore consumer market policy archives.[](https://www.legislation.gov.uk/)
—
This response provides granular search strategies for each search link, tailored to both causes of action, leveraging each site’s functionality to uncover evidence. I couldn’t fully access some databases (e.g., ECHR, National Archives) to test searches, but strategies are based on their described structures. Let me know how to proceed!
Search Link: [https://www.tron.trade.ec.europa.eu/](https://www.tron.trade.ec.europa.eu/)
This link appears to be a trade data portal from the European Commission (possibly related to trade statistics or market access). I’ll assume it provides data on trade flows, market shares, or sector-specific trade information.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Use “digital advertising services” or “online advertising market” to find trade statistics on the ad tech sector, focusing on market concentration or dominant players.
– **Search 2:** Search “Google ad tech trade” with filters for the EU or UK to identify Google’s market share or trade dominance in ad tech services.
– **Search 3:** Look for “advertising technology exports” to uncover data on Google’s cross-border ad tech operations.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “mobile devices” or “mobile services” to find trade data on mobile technology markets.
– **Search 2:** Use “search engine market share” with a focus on mobile to identify Google’s dominance in mobile search trade.
– **Search 3:** Search “mobile internet usage statistics” to find consumer behavior data supporting market control claims.
—
### Search Link: [https://trade.ec.europa.eu/](https://trade.ec.europa.eu/)
This is the main trade policy page for the European Commission, offering access to trade agreements, policy documents, and market access information.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “digital markets act” or “competition in digital advertising” to find policy documents on regulating ad tech dominance.
– **Search 2:** Use “Google investigation trade” to uncover trade-related probes into Google’s ad tech practices.
– **Search 3:** Look for “digital advertising market access” to explore barriers or dominance in the ad tech sector.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “digital services” or “mobile technology policy” to find consumer-focused trade policies.
– **Search 2:** Use “Google Android trade” to explore trade implications of mobile search dominance.
– **Search 3:** Search “consumer protection digital trade” for policies addressing consumer harm in mobile markets.
—
### Search Link: [https://showvoc.op.europa.eu/](https://showvoc.op.europa.eu/)
This is a vocabulary or thesaurus service (likely EuroVoc), useful for finding standardized terms for precise searches across EU databases.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Look up “digital advertising” to find related terms like “online advertising platforms” or “ad tech” for use in other searches.
– **Search 2:** Search “market dominance” to identify vocabulary for competition law contexts.
– **Search 3:** Use “publisher rights” to find terms related to publisher protections in digital markets.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “mobile search” to find standardized terms like “search engines” or “mobile internet.”
– **Search 2:** Look for “consumer choice” to identify vocabulary for consumer protection in digital services.
– **Search 3:** Use “default settings” to find terms related to pre-installed apps or search engines.
—
### Search Link: [https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/](https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/)
Eurostat is the EU’s statistical office, offering data on economic sectors, market shares, and consumer behavior.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “digital advertising expenditure” with filters for recent years to find market size and growth data.
– **Search 2:** Use “market share online advertising” to identify Google’s dominance statistics.
– **Search 3:** Look for “revenue digital advertising platforms” to compare Google’s ad tech revenue with competitors.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “mobile internet usage” to find statistics on consumer reliance on mobile search.
– **Search 2:** Use “search engine market share” with a focus on mobile to quantify Google’s dominance.
– **Search 3:** Look for “consumer behavior mobile search” to explore how default settings influence usage.
—
### Search Link: [https://data.gov.uk/](https://data.gov.uk/)
This is the UK’s open data portal, providing datasets on various sectors, including digital markets and consumer behavior.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “digital advertising statistics UK” to find UK-specific ad tech market data.
– **Search 2:** Use “online advertising revenue” to explore financial impacts on publishers.
– **Search 3:** Look for “ad tech market concentration” to identify dominance metrics.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “mobile search statistics UK” to find consumer usage patterns.
– **Search 2:** Use “search engine usage data” with a focus on mobile to quantify Google’s share.
– **Search 3:** Look for “consumerSources mobile internet behavior” to support claims of limited choice.
—
### Search Link: [https://violationtrackeruk.org/](https://violationtrackeruk.org/)
This database likely tracks corporate violations in the UK, including competition law infringements.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google” or “Alphabet” to find competition law violations related to ad tech.
– **Search 2:** Use “digital advertising fines” to identify penalties for anti-competitive practices.
– **Search 3:** Look for “publisher complaints Google” to find documented harm to publishers.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google mobile search violations” to find consumer-related infringements.
– **Search 2:** Use “Android fines” to explore penalties tied to mobile dominance.
– **Search 3:** Look for “consumer protection Google” to find violations affecting mobile search users.
—
### Search Link: [https://catribunal.org.uk/](https://catribunal.org.uk/)
This is the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) website, hosting case information on competition law disputes in the UK.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google” or “digital advertising” to find ongoing or past cases involving ad tech dominance.
– **Search 2:** Use “abuse of dominance ad tech” to identify relevant legal challenges.
– **Search 3:** Look for “publisher collective actions” to find cases supporting our claims.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google mobile” or “search engine competition” to find consumer-related cases.
– **Search 2:** Use “mobile search dominance” to explore legal precedents.
– **Search 3:** Look for “consumer harm mobile search” to find cases addressing consumer impacts.
—
### Search Link: [https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/competition-and-markets-authority](https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/competition-and-markets-authority)
This is the CMA’s website, offering reports, investigations, and decisions on competition issues.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “digital advertising market study” to find CMA reports on ad tech dominance.
– **Search 2:** Use “Google ad tech investigation” to uncover specific probes or findings.
– **Search 3:** Look for “publisher competition concerns” to explore documented harm.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “mobile search investigation” to find CMA actions on mobile dominance.
– **Search 2:** Use “Google Android case” to explore past or ongoing investigations.
– **Search 3:** Look for “consumer choice search engines” to find reports on market impacts.
—
### Search Link: [https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/](https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/)
This is the European Commission’s competition policy page, providing access to EU-level competition cases and policies.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google ad tech” to find EU investigations or decisions on ad tech dominance.
– **Search 2:** Use “digital advertising competition” to explore broader policy documents.
– **Search 3:** Look for “publisher rights digital markets” to find protections or rulings.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google Android” to find the landmark case on mobile search tying.
– **Search 2:** Use “mobile search dominance” to explore EU actions on consumer impacts.
– **Search 3:** Look for “consumer choice digital services” to find policy discussions on search defaults.
—
### Search Link: [https://www.bailii.org/](https://www.bailii.org/)
This is the British and Irish Legal Information Institute (BAILII), a database of legal cases and judgments.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Ad Tech – Publishers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google competition law” with filters for UK courts to find ad tech-related judgments.
– **Search 2:** Use “digital advertising dominance” to identify cases on market control.
– **Search 3:** Look for “publisher vs Google” to find direct legal challenges.
– **Cause of Action: Abuse of Dominant Position (Mobile Search – Consumers)**
– **Search 1:** Search “Google mobile search” to find consumer-focused competition cases.
– **Search 2:** Use “competition law mobile devices” to explore broader legal contexts.
– **Search 3:** Look for “consumer harm search engines” to find rulings on consumer impacts.
—
This response covers all search links with tailored, granular searches for each cause of action, leveraging each site’s functionality to gather evidence supporting our case. Let me know if you need further refinements!